Bombs in lavatories

The conviction of a team of radical would-be terrorists who discussed planting IEDs in the lavatories of the British Stock Exchange  reminds me that lavatories are a theme in many IED attacks, which I think is curious.  Here’s a range of previous “bombs in the bogs””

Only a couple of days ago some sort of apparent explosive device was found in the lavatory of a Libyan plane in Egypt    For what its worth I don’t think it was an IED but the story is pretty cloudy for now.

In May 2008 there was the very peculiar incident in Exeter, UK, where a decidedly odd individual detonated a device while he was in the lavatories of a fast food restaurant.

In 1957 an elderly man blew himself up in the lavatory of a passenger aircraft over California. A good investigation report is here    The device was constructed by dynamite and blasting caps with the blasting caps initiated by matches and burning paper.  Only the perpetrator was killed.

A similar dynamite IED functioned in the lavatory of an aircraft in 1962 over Iowa, this time killing all aboard. http://www.airsafe.com/plane-crash/western-airlines-flight-39-1957.pdf

A Canadian passenger aircraft  blew up after a device exploded in the lavatory over British Colombia in 1965. The crime was never solved.

In 1939, as part of a significant Irish terrorist bombing campaign in England a bomb was planted in a public lavatory in Oxford street. Disaster was averted when the lavatory attendant dumped the IED in a  bucket of water (not a good response, but a brave man).  Several other incidents in this campaign were IEDs left in lavatories. The attendant was awarded £5 for his bravery

In 1884, during another Irish bombing campaign in England, (yes there have been a few) the headquarters of the Metropolitan Police, Scotland Yard, was severely damaged in an explosion caused by a large IED being left in a public lavatory next door to the police Headquarters.  Here’s a picture.

There’s an interesting aspect to this story. Several months earlier, in 1883, an Irish revolutionary organization , the Irish Republican Brotherhood sent a letter to Scotland Yard  threatening to ‘blow Superintendent Williamson off his stool’ and dynamite all the public buildings in London on 30 May 1884. The Met Police largely ignored the warning, and then on the very day promised the explosion at Scotland Yard occurred, as did two other explosions elsewhere in London.  The failure of the Met Police to protect their own headquarters, as well as the occurrence of several other IED attacks across London embarrassed the police severely and led indirectly to the formation of Special Branch.

There are numerous other IED attacks on lavatories, too many to list.

Massive Explosion in New Jersey

….In 1916

Following the blog posts about Tunney and Eagan, a number of correspondents have asked for more detail about the German saboteur campaign in the US of the period. I’ve recently undertaken an analysis of this campaign (and one other from history) to compare current C-IED “Attack the Network” strategies with previous C-IED Attack the Network efforts.  The German saboteur campaign is fascinating not only for the parallels with modern terrorism and the lessons learned and since forgotten, but some very interesting operational aspects from both the enemy and friendly forces.

This campaign by German saboteurs saw a number of cells operating in the New York and New Jersey areas attack 47 factories, 43 ships and a number of docks and railway facilities over about a 2 year period from 1915- 1917. They used both explosive IEDs and incendiaries.  Many German ships were being blockaded in US ports by the British and the sailors provided ample human resources for the German authorities efforts to prevent the industrial might of the US from providing munitions for the French, British and Russians fighting Imperial Germany, before the US entered the war in 1917.

There were many interesting attacks which I will blog in the future. The biggest was an arson attack on the Black Tom munition loading facility on the New Jersey shoreline, right opposite The Statue of Liberty.  Incendiaries were set by German agents and there is strong evidence to suggest that some local watchman were paid to turn a blind eye, at the very least. Some time later the fire took hold and caused a detonation of 1000 tons of explosives. The Statue of Liberty was damaged, windows were broken across Manhattan and the explosion heard as far away as Philadelphia and Maryland. According to one source it was measured at 5.5 on the Richter scale. Remarkably few people were killed however.

 

 

After the war a reparations committee sat for many years and argued whether the Black Tom explosion was sabotage or not.  Eventually in 1939 the German government agreed to pay reparations – but WW2 intervened and a $50 million reparation was finally paid in 1979.

A memorial stone at the scene, within sight of lower Manhattan records the incident calling it “One of the worst acts of terrorism in American history”.

After the war the response to the German Saboteur threat was assessed in retrospect (leading eventually to the formation of the FBI under Hoover), and I rather like this quote from the former New York Police Commissioner, Tunney’s former boss:

“The lessons to America are clear as day. We must not again be caught napping with no adequate national intelligence organization. The several Federal bureaus should be welded together into one, and that one should be eternally and comprehensively vigilant.”

Arthur Woods, former Police Commissioner NYPD 1919

Hellburner Hoop

Readers of the blog will know I’m researching 16th century IEDs. This one is worth a blog.

The development of explosive devices required a number of technological developments. In the 14th and 15th century the manufacture of saltpeter (Potassium nitrate) became industrialized allowing the production of volumes of blackpowder.  (I’m simplifying things here for the short space appropriate in a blog).  Then with the invention of the Wheelock for firearms in the early part of the 16th century, this allowed for command initiation, by pull by using the initiation system for a gun in an explosive charge. There are a few red herrings around with regard to the use of Iron Pyrites and flint, which in a flintlock in the early 1600s became the favored option once stronger steel was made that wouldn’t be eroded by the flint – pyrites being the spark provider when earlier, softer steel was used in firearms. But of course in an explosive device the “lock” is only going to be used once, so I suspect flint initiation in a Wheelock mechanism, was the first use in IEDs in the 1500s.

The other engineering development in the 16th century that is pertinent is the clock.  Clocks became more widespread, as a cultural phenomenon and as technology permitted smaller clocks (I’m simplifying a chapter of my book here, into two sentences).  The first clock-initiated IEDs occurred in the 16th century. I can’t tell you exactly when the first one was, but I provide below the details of the incident that is the earliest incident where I can find details of such a device.  It is significant too, because I think it may be the IED that caused the greatest number of fatalities, ever, with possibly as many as 1000 killed. Possibly, too, the biggest ever IED. Possibly, too, the first ever WMD.  It also has a significant impact on a whole war in terms of the terror it gave, I believe too on the eventual defeat of The Spanish Armada, some years later, when they scattered before the British fleet, at least partly in fear of a similar device.

In 1584 the city of Antwerp was under siege and blockaded by the Spanish Army following a rebellion. An Italian Engineer, in the secret pay of the English, was supporting the Dutch rebels. In order to destroy a huge pontoon bridge the Spanish had constructed, he was given two Seventy ton ships, the Fortuyn and the Hoop. (“Fortune” and Hope”).

The concept of fire ships was already known and had been used already by the Dutch. But Giambelli, the Italian had bigger ideas. He constructed two massive IEDs, one in each ship. And when I say massive, I mean massive.  He was helped by two key individuals, Bory, a clock maker from Antwerp and Timmerman, a “mechanic”. Here’s a description of how each was made from a source document I found recently:

In the hold of each vessel, along the whole length, was laid down a solid flooring of brick and mortar, one foot thick and five feet wide.  Upon this was built a chamber of marble mason-work, forty feet long, three and a half feet broad, as many high, and with side-walks five feet in thickness. This was the crater.  It was filled with seven thousand pounds of gunpowder, of a kind superior to anything known, and prepared  by Giambelli himself. It was covered with a roof, six feet in thickness, formed of blue tombstones, placed edgewise. (Note: some sources say also this was sealed with lead)  Over this crater, rose a hollow cone, or pyramid, made of heavy marble slabs, and filled with mill-stones, cannon balls, blocks of marble, chain-shot, iron hooks, plough-coulters, and every dangerous missile that could be imagined.  The spaces between the mine and the sides of each ship were likewise filled with paving stones, iron-bound stakes, harpoons, and other projectiles.  The whole fabric was then covered by a smooth light flooring of planks and brick-work, upon which was a pile of wood: This was to be lighted at the proper time, in order that the two vessels might present the appearance of simple fire-ships, intended only to excite a conflagration of the bridge.

The initiation system for the Fortuyn was a slow burning fuse, while the Hoop, courtesy of Mr Bory the clockmaker, was initiated with an adapted clock. I’m guessing the striker of the clock was a modification of a firearm lock, wheel-lock or flintlock. One source suggests that the time delay was one hour. These ships were sent down the waterway with skeleton crews, along with 32 “normal” fireships, with the crews as usual setting them alight before getting away in small boats, allowing the currents, tides and winds to carry them towards the pontoon bridge.

The Fortuyn failed to be carried towards the best target and then when the charge exploded, it only partially functioned, causing no damage and no injuries. The entire Spanish Army, called to the alert on the approach of the fire ships, to fend them off and extinguish the fires, was heard jeering.  But the Hoop bore down on its target and became entangled with Spanish ships and the bridge itself. As soldiers boarded her to extinguish the fire on her deck, the clock ticked, … then struck.  7,000 pounds of blackpowder, reputedly the best Antwerp possessed, exploded and the pontoon bridge, many ships and hundreds of soldiers disappeared. Some sources say 800 Spanish soldiers were killed at that instant, others put the figure at 1000. Many remarkable tales exist about oddities of the explosive effect. (Detail will follow in the book!) Two of the Spanish generals bodies were found some time later, their bodies thrown considerable distances.

Although the Antwerp rebels were unable to exploit the effect of the explosion, probably because they too were simply shocked by its effect, the incident achieved immediate notoriety across Europe and great interest from military experts who recognized this as a new type of warfare.

Three years later when the Spanish Armada came to invade England, the use of fireships caused panic among the Spanish fleet, because of concerns that they could be loaded with explosives.. and by then they knew that Giambelli was overtly in England, working for the Queen. The Spanish Fleet was seriously disrupted and control of it was never regained by its admirals. And as a result, my Spanish language skills are limited today to ordering “Dos cervezas, por favor”  I have grossly simplified a complex action here, but hopefully blog readers will appreciate the unusual construct of the IED on the Fortuyn and the Hoop, and see the significance of the initiation mechanism.   In another aside and related to the last post about the assassination of generals….When the Prince of Parma, the Spanish General did ride into Antwerp, some months later, a conqueror, there had been a plot to kill him and everybody near him by blowing up a street over which it was calculated he would be sure to pass. Nothing came of this, because the plot was revealed before the procession occurred.

One final thought…. The Hoop attack concept was used again… in 1809 when British Admiral Cochrane attacked the French in the Basque Roads attack, and again in 1942, when the bomb ship HMS Campbelltown rammed the gates of the drydock in the St Nazaire raid as part of “Operation Chariot”.

Historical use of IEDs

Some of you will know that I have an interest in the historical use of IEDs, (there’s a book being written, very slowly!) and for many of my presentations and seminars I use some interesting aspects of the historical use of IEDs to illustrate that these aren’t new problems.  My definition of an IED excludes the use of gunpowder to “mine” castle walls.  Aside from some interesting Chinese historical use of explosives, until now the earliest use of an IED that I could find in records was at the siege of Pskov in 1581.  The city of Pskov was being besieged by Stephan Bathory, who had been elected King of Poland.  Bathory’s troops were Polish, German, Hungarian and Scottish.  Bathory had an IED made in the form of a jeweled casket, by an IED maker called Johann Ostromecki that was sent to the Russian defender Ivan Petrovich Shujski.  The casket was sent to Shujksi ostensibly by a freed Russian prisoner. The casket, “booby-trapped”, exploded when opened by some of Shujski’s companions ,killing them but not its intended target.

Other historical use of IEDs from around the same time include roadside IEDs being used to ambush invading Spanish troops in Holland (I have a copy of great engraving showing a multiple IED attack from around the 1580s) and English use of “exploding” fire ships also against the Spanish… and evidence of an Italian engineer who seemed to be designing a range of innovative explosive devices for the English around this time.

However, my research over the past few days has uncovered perhaps earlier use of IEDs.  The key technological development within the confines of my definition, is the invention, around 1500, perhaps by Leonardo da Vinci, of the flintlock/wheelock mechanism. Such a mechanism was actually first made somewhere around 1510-1520. This invention provides the opportunity to initiate gunpowder charges at a distance by means of a spring to release the mechanism, by pulling a string.  Using a clock to initiate the flintlock also developed about this time and again I have found an interesting diagram from some time in the 1500s allegedly showing a clock initiated IED.

The recent finds I have made include a book written by Samuel Zimmermann of Augsberg in 1573. Most of the book discusses firework design, but sections also discuss initiation of explosive devices by means of “hidden springs” and “hidden string”. Zimmermann discusses “booby trapping” a chair that will initiate a device when sat on, and booby trapping a “purse of gold” left lying in the street.

It is possible too that a collection of explosive recipes offered for sale to Queen Elisabeth in 1574, which makes reference to “hollow tronckes” could be a reference to IEDs

Another book discussing a range of IEDs from this period is by Austrian Wulf von Senfftenberg, who discusses in some detail IEDs such as the Pskov device.  Von Senfftenberg advocates using explosive letters against Turks, but suggests the letters must only be carried by Jews!

More to follow and I’ll try and post some of the historical diagrams if people are interested…

Close Me
Looking for Something?
Search:
Post Categories: