Early Chinese Victim-Operated IEDs

I’ve been “following my nose” looking for some early historical uses of victim operated or booby trap IEDs and found an interesting reference to an intriguing Chinese IED of the 14th century.  While there are references to both command and victim operated IEDs in China a century earlier (connected to war against Kubla Khan’s Mongols) there is a Chinese text called the Houlongjing (Fire Dragon Manual) from around 1350 which contains some fascinating detail of booby trap IEDs and their initiation system.

 

The Huolongjing describes IEDs constructed from iron spheres filled with gunpowder, and within a range of other IEDs describes two of particular note, translated as the “ground thunder explosive” and the “self-trespassing” types.  The text says the following:

These mines are mostly installed at frontier gates and passes. Pieces of bamboo are sawn into sections nine feet in length, all septa of the bamboo being removed, except the last; and it is then bandaged round with fresh cow hide tape. Boiling oil is next poured into the tube and left there before being removed (I’m guessing these measures are to waterproof the container.)   The fuse starts from the bottom of the tube and the explosive (blackpowder) is compressed into it to form an explosive mine. The powder fills up eight tenths of the tube, while lead or iron pellets take up the rest of the space:, then the open end is sealed with wax. . A trench five feet in depth is dug (for the device to be concealed). The fuse is connected to a firing device which ignites when disturbed.

The Houlongjing then describes an initiation mechanism for this device as consisting of a steel wheel, which directed sparks onto the connection of fuses running to the buried explosive charges. That alone is interesting, but a further Chinese document of 1606 adds detail, about a flint connected to the steel wheel and the steel wheel being driven by a weight drive. There appears to have been some sort of pin release caused by the victim stepping on a flexible board, which releases a weight on a string. The string is wrapped around the axle of the steel wheel or wheels , to which a flint is attached. The flint rotates round striking a steel, causing a spark, which initiates the IED.

There’s a connection here to the invention of the wheel-lock mechanism by Leonardo da Vinci in about 1500. I’m pretty certain that as well as being used as the initiation mechanism for muskets, wheel-locks began to be used as IED initiation systems in the late 1500s.  Of course too there is a link between the weight drive of the Chinese IED and the development of weight driven clocks with escapements.  Technology development is interesting when various aspects run in parallel.

There are some detailed diagrams of the initiations systems in the Houlongjing but I confess I can’t yet make head nor tail of them.

Complex IED attack circa 1584

At readers’ request, another example of an IED attack from the 1500s. I showed this to then Col Joe Votel when he set up the IED TF (the predecessor to JIEDDO) a few years ago.  This image below shows a complex IED attack from the early 1580s, I believe from the Spanish war against the Dutch rebels. Here we have a foreign Army  (the Spaniards) invading a country and the locals (with a different religion) objecting. The locals (the Dutch) have secret help from a neighbouring country (England) with similar religious beliefs who also regard the Spaniards as enemies, but don’t yet want to engage directly, so they provided explosive expertise to the local rebels.  (Get my drift?)

The image is clearer in its original form but this is the best I can do on this blog page. This is a complex IED attack of three command initiated IEDs against a military convoy.  The attacks is well planned and carefully constructed with IEDs functioning at the front of the convoy  (upper right), rear (upper left) and centre.  Note that the firing point for all three is across the river preventing the convoy’s soldiers from counterattacking. The enemy convoy are marching on foot from left to right.

From reading the WIT report on CIDNE (!) I can see that each IED consisted of a barrel of gunpowder buried under the road. In each barrel is embedded a wheel-lock mechanism, triggered by the terrorist across the river pulling a string.  You can see the string in the image if you look carefully.

The effect of the explosions is interesting, if you look carefully. There is a large explosion in each case and rocks and soldiers are thrown in the air and the river, with smoke billowing from each location.  Only two of the “terrorists” at the firing points are pictured, one on the left hand edge half way up, the other on the bottom right corner. (the third is out of the picture to the right). Each firing point is concealed in bushes with a good view of the road, and safe from counter-attack.

There are then cannons set up to subsequently engage the survivors, four in total.  So a good example of a complex attack on a convoy/foot patrol.  Despite the primitive technology I venture to suggest not much has changed and indeed the technology in theaters at the moment isn’t all that much further forward.

Comments welcome.

Hellburner Hoop

Readers of the blog will know I’m researching 16th century IEDs. This one is worth a blog.

The development of explosive devices required a number of technological developments. In the 14th and 15th century the manufacture of saltpeter (Potassium nitrate) became industrialized allowing the production of volumes of blackpowder.  (I’m simplifying things here for the short space appropriate in a blog).  Then with the invention of the Wheelock for firearms in the early part of the 16th century, this allowed for command initiation, by pull by using the initiation system for a gun in an explosive charge. There are a few red herrings around with regard to the use of Iron Pyrites and flint, which in a flintlock in the early 1600s became the favored option once stronger steel was made that wouldn’t be eroded by the flint – pyrites being the spark provider when earlier, softer steel was used in firearms. But of course in an explosive device the “lock” is only going to be used once, so I suspect flint initiation in a Wheelock mechanism, was the first use in IEDs in the 1500s.

The other engineering development in the 16th century that is pertinent is the clock.  Clocks became more widespread, as a cultural phenomenon and as technology permitted smaller clocks (I’m simplifying a chapter of my book here, into two sentences).  The first clock-initiated IEDs occurred in the 16th century. I can’t tell you exactly when the first one was, but I provide below the details of the incident that is the earliest incident where I can find details of such a device.  It is significant too, because I think it may be the IED that caused the greatest number of fatalities, ever, with possibly as many as 1000 killed. Possibly, too, the biggest ever IED. Possibly, too, the first ever WMD.  It also has a significant impact on a whole war in terms of the terror it gave, I believe too on the eventual defeat of The Spanish Armada, some years later, when they scattered before the British fleet, at least partly in fear of a similar device.

In 1584 the city of Antwerp was under siege and blockaded by the Spanish Army following a rebellion. An Italian Engineer, in the secret pay of the English, was supporting the Dutch rebels. In order to destroy a huge pontoon bridge the Spanish had constructed, he was given two Seventy ton ships, the Fortuyn and the Hoop. (“Fortune” and Hope”).

The concept of fire ships was already known and had been used already by the Dutch. But Giambelli, the Italian had bigger ideas. He constructed two massive IEDs, one in each ship. And when I say massive, I mean massive.  He was helped by two key individuals, Bory, a clock maker from Antwerp and Timmerman, a “mechanic”. Here’s a description of how each was made from a source document I found recently:

In the hold of each vessel, along the whole length, was laid down a solid flooring of brick and mortar, one foot thick and five feet wide.  Upon this was built a chamber of marble mason-work, forty feet long, three and a half feet broad, as many high, and with side-walks five feet in thickness. This was the crater.  It was filled with seven thousand pounds of gunpowder, of a kind superior to anything known, and prepared  by Giambelli himself. It was covered with a roof, six feet in thickness, formed of blue tombstones, placed edgewise. (Note: some sources say also this was sealed with lead)  Over this crater, rose a hollow cone, or pyramid, made of heavy marble slabs, and filled with mill-stones, cannon balls, blocks of marble, chain-shot, iron hooks, plough-coulters, and every dangerous missile that could be imagined.  The spaces between the mine and the sides of each ship were likewise filled with paving stones, iron-bound stakes, harpoons, and other projectiles.  The whole fabric was then covered by a smooth light flooring of planks and brick-work, upon which was a pile of wood: This was to be lighted at the proper time, in order that the two vessels might present the appearance of simple fire-ships, intended only to excite a conflagration of the bridge.

The initiation system for the Fortuyn was a slow burning fuse, while the Hoop, courtesy of Mr Bory the clockmaker, was initiated with an adapted clock. I’m guessing the striker of the clock was a modification of a firearm lock, wheel-lock or flintlock. One source suggests that the time delay was one hour. These ships were sent down the waterway with skeleton crews, along with 32 “normal” fireships, with the crews as usual setting them alight before getting away in small boats, allowing the currents, tides and winds to carry them towards the pontoon bridge.

The Fortuyn failed to be carried towards the best target and then when the charge exploded, it only partially functioned, causing no damage and no injuries. The entire Spanish Army, called to the alert on the approach of the fire ships, to fend them off and extinguish the fires, was heard jeering.  But the Hoop bore down on its target and became entangled with Spanish ships and the bridge itself. As soldiers boarded her to extinguish the fire on her deck, the clock ticked, … then struck.  7,000 pounds of blackpowder, reputedly the best Antwerp possessed, exploded and the pontoon bridge, many ships and hundreds of soldiers disappeared. Some sources say 800 Spanish soldiers were killed at that instant, others put the figure at 1000. Many remarkable tales exist about oddities of the explosive effect. (Detail will follow in the book!) Two of the Spanish generals bodies were found some time later, their bodies thrown considerable distances.

Although the Antwerp rebels were unable to exploit the effect of the explosion, probably because they too were simply shocked by its effect, the incident achieved immediate notoriety across Europe and great interest from military experts who recognized this as a new type of warfare.

Three years later when the Spanish Armada came to invade England, the use of fireships caused panic among the Spanish fleet, because of concerns that they could be loaded with explosives.. and by then they knew that Giambelli was overtly in England, working for the Queen. The Spanish Fleet was seriously disrupted and control of it was never regained by its admirals. And as a result, my Spanish language skills are limited today to ordering “Dos cervezas, por favor”  I have grossly simplified a complex action here, but hopefully blog readers will appreciate the unusual construct of the IED on the Fortuyn and the Hoop, and see the significance of the initiation mechanism.   In another aside and related to the last post about the assassination of generals….When the Prince of Parma, the Spanish General did ride into Antwerp, some months later, a conqueror, there had been a plot to kill him and everybody near him by blowing up a street over which it was calculated he would be sure to pass. Nothing came of this, because the plot was revealed before the procession occurred.

One final thought…. The Hoop attack concept was used again… in 1809 when British Admiral Cochrane attacked the French in the Basque Roads attack, and again in 1942, when the bomb ship HMS Campbelltown rammed the gates of the drydock in the St Nazaire raid as part of “Operation Chariot”.

Old and bold

I came across this while researching… in a German manuscript dated 1572. I think it’s the earliest EOD tool I have come across.  Nearly as old as some of the readers of this blog.

 

 

Historical use of IEDs

Some of you will know that I have an interest in the historical use of IEDs, (there’s a book being written, very slowly!) and for many of my presentations and seminars I use some interesting aspects of the historical use of IEDs to illustrate that these aren’t new problems.  My definition of an IED excludes the use of gunpowder to “mine” castle walls.  Aside from some interesting Chinese historical use of explosives, until now the earliest use of an IED that I could find in records was at the siege of Pskov in 1581.  The city of Pskov was being besieged by Stephan Bathory, who had been elected King of Poland.  Bathory’s troops were Polish, German, Hungarian and Scottish.  Bathory had an IED made in the form of a jeweled casket, by an IED maker called Johann Ostromecki that was sent to the Russian defender Ivan Petrovich Shujski.  The casket was sent to Shujksi ostensibly by a freed Russian prisoner. The casket, “booby-trapped”, exploded when opened by some of Shujski’s companions ,killing them but not its intended target.

Other historical use of IEDs from around the same time include roadside IEDs being used to ambush invading Spanish troops in Holland (I have a copy of great engraving showing a multiple IED attack from around the 1580s) and English use of “exploding” fire ships also against the Spanish… and evidence of an Italian engineer who seemed to be designing a range of innovative explosive devices for the English around this time.

However, my research over the past few days has uncovered perhaps earlier use of IEDs.  The key technological development within the confines of my definition, is the invention, around 1500, perhaps by Leonardo da Vinci, of the flintlock/wheelock mechanism. Such a mechanism was actually first made somewhere around 1510-1520. This invention provides the opportunity to initiate gunpowder charges at a distance by means of a spring to release the mechanism, by pulling a string.  Using a clock to initiate the flintlock also developed about this time and again I have found an interesting diagram from some time in the 1500s allegedly showing a clock initiated IED.

The recent finds I have made include a book written by Samuel Zimmermann of Augsberg in 1573. Most of the book discusses firework design, but sections also discuss initiation of explosive devices by means of “hidden springs” and “hidden string”. Zimmermann discusses “booby trapping” a chair that will initiate a device when sat on, and booby trapping a “purse of gold” left lying in the street.

It is possible too that a collection of explosive recipes offered for sale to Queen Elisabeth in 1574, which makes reference to “hollow tronckes” could be a reference to IEDs

Another book discussing a range of IEDs from this period is by Austrian Wulf von Senfftenberg, who discusses in some detail IEDs such as the Pskov device.  Von Senfftenberg advocates using explosive letters against Turks, but suggests the letters must only be carried by Jews!

More to follow and I’ll try and post some of the historical diagrams if people are interested…

Close Me
Looking for Something?
Search:
Post Categories: